That was very interesting to read especially the fact that as of that period people in general weren't yet aware of the 'norms' of beauty and so found an honest portrayal to be no insult. Of course, I rather think he took this a little further that Durer did with his drawings of ordinary people.
Very interesting stuff! Especially the observations about norms of beauty, and how society then viewed portraits, people who look other than "ideal," etc. Another kind of innocence lost.
The Renaissance freed us from some kinds of mental and aesthetic tyranny and substituted others. Boundaries, rules, and fetters, with all the troubles they cause, seem to come along for the ride after every major change. Like Godel's proof, which demonstrated that any mathematical/logical system robust enough to include the basic functions of arithmetic will also be able to prove inconsistent or contradictory propositions. Seeds of it's own collapse built in from the start. We don't have the whole story on reality, and we keep trying to make sense of ALL of it with only a partial understanding.
Thank you for taking the time to say you've been here.
I am sorry to say that I don't publish anonymous comments unless I know you through your initials, first name or blog name. I don't publish comments that have ANY kind of commercial or 'for sale' links.
"When the Amherst sphinx styled herself a pagan, she meant she didn’t believe in the biblical God. What sort of deity, if any, she did believe in is hard to pinpoint." -- Gary Sloan, "Emily Dickinson: Pagan Sphinx,"
I believe that the images and writing posted here fall under the "fair use" section of the U.S. copyright law http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107, as they are intended for educational purposes and are not in a medium that is of commercial nature.
Yikes! She can never have been a great beauty!
ReplyDeleteVery interesting painting that seems very contemporary in some sense. The writeup is fascinating.
ReplyDeleteI think I had a blind date with her.
ReplyDeleteYogi - yes! It looks like it's been spoofed, doesn't it? Thank you for clicking the link.
ReplyDeleteFascinating image. A little too much honesty from the other end of the paint brush, methinks.
ReplyDeleteThat was very interesting to read especially the fact that as of that period people in general weren't yet aware of the 'norms' of beauty and so found an honest portrayal to be no insult. Of course, I rather think he took this a little further that Durer did with his drawings of ordinary people.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting stuff! Especially the observations about norms of beauty, and how society then viewed portraits, people who look other than "ideal," etc. Another kind of innocence lost.
ReplyDeleteThe Renaissance freed us from some kinds of mental and aesthetic tyranny and substituted others. Boundaries, rules, and fetters, with all the troubles they cause, seem to come along for the ride after every major change. Like Godel's proof, which demonstrated that any mathematical/logical system robust enough to include the basic functions of arithmetic will also be able to prove inconsistent or contradictory propositions. Seeds of it's own collapse built in from the start. We don't have the whole story on reality, and we keep trying to make sense of ALL of it with only a partial understanding.
What do angels see? What do they think of beauty?